Reinier Olislagers <[email protected]> hat am 15. August 2012 um 16:03 geschrieben:> On 15-8-2012 15:13, Jürgen Hestermann wrote: >[...] > >> Regardless, a user can customize that fallback environmentoptions.xml > >> and distribute it. That's why there's an overwrite question. > > > > Yes, but if it is not used why ask and let the user believe that it is > > used? There are lots of other XML files in the installation path which > > seem to be overwritten silently when installing a snapshot. > Never seen any evidence of silent overwrites. > The fallback environmentoptions.xml is used in some situation. I can't > help it you don't grasp the difference of primary versus secondary > config path... TBH it took me a while to catch on as well. > For discussion: perhaps this version could be renamed as > environmentoptionstemplate.xml or something?
That would complicate things. IMO it would better if the secondary folder has is renamed and/or a prominent README.txt file is put there. >[...] Mattias
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
