On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Reinier Olislagers <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3-9-2012 16:53, Ludo Brands wrote: >>> Start from here: http://developers.facebook.com/docs/reference/api/ >>> The authentication uses OAuth 2.0 which I'm not aware any >>> implementation of. BigChimp and ludob created an OAuth 1.0a >>> implementation in fpctwit, maybe you could take that as a >>> base (though I'm not sure about the effort since I have no >>> idea about the differences between 1.0a and 2.0). >>> >> I have also written an Oauth2 implementation for the Google API (implemented >> most of the Google Calendar api). Oauth2 is designed to be easier than >> Oauth1 and supported by many more companies that all wanted their own thing >> in the standard. The result is a standard that is lacking portability and >> every Oauth2 implementation is different and needs coding from almost >> scratch. Very little in Oauth1 can be re-used in Oauth2. If interested I can >> sent you the Oauth2 implementation for Google using Synapse for the HTTP >> layer. > Ludo, > > If you want to and your license allows it to, we can add your OAuth2 > code to my existing fpctwit repository (if possible perhaps rename it to > fpcoauth).... with some big caveats in the readme about oauth2 being not > one standard but many etc...
At the moment my application is "public domain", I might change it to MIT/BSD license > > Regards, > Reinier aka BigChimp > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
