Am 10.10.2012 16:11, schrieb Bart:
> On 10/10/12, Mark Morgan Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>> As with most if not all open source projects, if we don't like it we can
>> fork off. However my own position is that I trust the core developers,
>> who are effectively defined by their understanding of how the code works.
>
> But then again, it would be nice for committers to know if extending
> an LCL component beyound it's Delphi's counterpart is considered to be
> "officially" OK (as long as the extension is considered usefull and
> meaningfull and not just fullfilling the needs of very few people (and
> there may be more criteria)).
>
> Getting back to the thread that stated this discussion:
> I could spend time and energy on implementing an ImageList for
> TDBNavigator (which Delphi doesn't have, and which maybe usefull for
> more than just a few people). But i would then become very frustrated
> if the patch was rejected because of "Delphi incompatibility".
The point is probably: how big is the breakage of other people's work?
Extreme example from FPC: from time to time people suggest to replace
begin ... end by { ... } even in FPC because it is easier to type. This
might be even true for a German keyboard where { means also three key
strokes but nevertheless this would break everybody's code with little
benefit because modern IDEs can take care of useless typing.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
