> For clarity, I believe the correct intended use of explicit > conversions is when a loss of data may occur while converting a type > (rounding a float for example), and implicit conversions are correct > when no loss of data can occur (assigning a 32bit integer to a 32bit > float).
Even then loss of data can occur, because a 32 bit float can not represent 31 binary digits. Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
