apt-get install gdb ? on Mint, i must install gdb manually...
2012/10/15 Kamen Ketev <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I install Lazarus from ****Debian**** ****Repository**** under Ubuntu > and compyle new project without problem. But can't find debugger. I > install Lazarus 1.0.2 from sf and compyle new project without problem. > Without debugger they runs. Please tell me where I can find debugger under > Ubuntu. Thanks! > > > > -------- Оригинално писмо -------- > От: Bernd ** > Относно: [Lazarus] Fwd: Build-Depends: imagemagick > До: Lazarus mailing list ** > Изпратено на: Неделя, 2012, Октомври 14 04:52:26 EEST > > > > [forwarded another copy to the list because of mailinglist was missing > in recipients] > > 2012/10/8 Mattias Gaertner > <[email protected]<http://../servlet/sendmess?ac=sab&[email protected]> > >: > > > That's a lot > > of work and I'm glad they do it. > > The problem is the Debian packages from Debian don't do it either! > > They consist of many hundred lines of convoluted unmaintained(!) > script that is trying to press every possible button the debian > packaging system provides (except the new dh overrides which would > simplify matters) (it has meta-packages and virtual packages and > versioned packages, it is using update-alternatives for no reason (who > wants to install two different ancient(!) versions of Lazarus > simultaneously?)), it is ripping apart lazarus into many small pieces > and introducing new bugs and damaging Lazarus' reputation and the only > thing it is *NOT* doing is installing all needed files where they > belong! It does not install mime types, it is trying to intstall a > default config file that does not even exist anymore, when you start > it for the first time it will complain about wrong paths and packages > installed but no .lpk files found (probably because lazarus-ide fails > to depend on lazarus-src which is *essential* for using the ide, why > did they split it in the first place?), even a simple make install > even in the current limited form would immediately give a better > install than the debs from Debian. > > I would rather not see any of these half-baked and broken Debian > packages at all in any of the repositories so that no new user > accidentally installs them and then immediately comes to the > conclusion that Lazarus is completely broken and unusable because that > is exactly what currently happens when one installs Lazarus from the > Ubuntu software center. > > I vote for dumping this broken and unmaintained packaging entirely and > rewrite it from scratch in a much simpler way with only two packages, > one containing everything needed for building from the command line > with lazbuild and another package containing the ide, the source and > all the rest that is needed to use the ide because this is the only > logical and natural separation that would make sense. Everything going > beyond that would be nonsense and wasted manpower. > > If Lazarus and Pascal programming and Pascal units are by design > incompatible with the way how Debian is organized or how its ancient > bureaucratic policies blindly dictate and they cannot put such simple > and working packages into their Repository then so be it! It doesn't > matter! An alternative repository can be set up in one afternoon and > Debian could no longer damage the reputation of Lazarus by providing > ancient and broken packages. > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected]<http://../servlet/sendmess?ac=sab&[email protected]> > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > **** > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > > -- ________________________________ William de Oliveira Ferreira
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
