On 22/10/12 10:02, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote: > Henry Vermaak wrote: >> I built lazarus with fpc 2.7.1 for armhf this weekend. Why do you say >> 2.6.0 is needed? > > Because of the feeling with which most developers insist that 2.6.0 is > the one true way :-)
Yes, I tend to use 2.6.0, too, but armhf port doesn't exist in 2.6.0 (afaik) :) > OK, I'll try it for MIPS in a couple of days. I presume you were using > Lazarus trunk. Yes. I remember a rule that lazarus trunk is supposed to compile with both the latest fpc release and fpc trunk. Don't know if that's still the case, though. Henry -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
