2012/12/5 Andrew Brunner <[email protected]>: > . > > On Dec 5, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Juha Manninen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Andrew Brunner <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I'm getting overflow exceptions on values greater than integer. Can >>> someone revise all values from integer to ptrint so on 64 bit systems it >>> will be valid. >> >> You can scale the value in your code before using it for ProgressBar's >> Position. >> Integer has 2^31 positive values which should be enough for all the >> positions shown in a graphical component. >> > > It is far more important to realize that on 64bit systems the GUI components > can scale. I have already tested ptrint on Ubuntu x64. It only took a few > minor tweaks. > > I can provide diff if interested. But changes to windows callback for > comctrls will be needed as well. > > I assert that use of anything but ptrint in the factory with respect to > tprogressbar is a flaw. And it's a quick fix. >
And won't that break streaming a form to lfm or lrs? Especially when created on a 64 bits system and using on a 32 bits system? Vincent -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
