PluaL_Reg is defined by lua52.pas. In the email I omitted irrelevant code, but full source is attached in the first email.
在 六, 12月 29, 2012 at 3:13 下午，Flávio Etrusco <[email protected]> 写道： Your code sample doesn't have a declaration for PluaL_Reg (and you don't use the TluaLReg type). Was it a simple copy'n'paste error or is it declared by the Lua wrapper? On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:00 AM, xrfang wrote: > Sorry, we are talking about same thing. In my program I am using dynamic > array, NOT static, but the assembly is same. In leledumbo's example, the > assembly is differnt. > > 在 六, 12月 29, 2012 at 2:55 下午，Hans-Peter Diettrich 写道： > > leledumbo schrieb: >>> The Assembler shows that @lib and @lib[0] are exactly same thing. > > That's true for static arrays. > >> The following program shows that they are NOT the same > > That's true for dynamic (managed) arrays. > > You're talking about different array types. > > DoDi > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > > > > -- > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
