On 14/03/2013 16:35, Sven Barth wrote: > Am 14.03.2013 12:11, schrieb Lukasz Sokol: >>> I also believe the new FPC changes also means that with >>> properties you also can't use the short *= += -= etc syntax, >>> which I loved to use. The above would have been written as >>> >>> GCache.ClientHeight -= (DefaultRowHeight * FooterRowCount + 2); >>> >> and this is indeed surprising (but since operator overloads are >> functions, and first one to this operator needs to be 'var', then I >> guess, not really) > Huh? Operator overloads in FPC don't use "var" at all. Either you > have a unary operator like "not", "inc" or ":=" then you have one > parameter and one result or you have a binary operator like "+", > "and", ">=" then you have two parameters and one result.
OP (and Graeme) talked about c-style binary operators... -=, +=, and so on. >> (what if the operator function was 'inline' if we have such a >> keyword?) > If an operator has an inline modifier then its code will be inlined > if nothing (from the compiler's perspective) speaks against it > (overloaded operators are simply converted to function calls). > Would this mean you can't do Object.Property -= Something; without the inline? ? > Regards, Sven > L. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
