On 2013-04-22 10:31, Marco van de Voort wrote: > > But with what fpdoc ? Did you generate 2.6.2 docs with trunk fpdoc ?
I generated FPC 2.6.2 RTL and FCL docs about a week ago, using the fpdoc from trunk. It worked fine here. Just did the usual: make rtl.chk fcl.chk HTMLFMT=ipf FPCSRCDIR=/path/to/fpc Yes the HTMLFMT option is a bit weird, but my Makefiles skills are limited, and it was easier to tweak (years ago) the build process of HTML output. I would much prefer fpdoc project files, even for RTL and FCL. They work really well for fpGUI docs. >> This is normal. Printed and Online docs should not look the same. >> I may need to do some efforts to improve PDF output, though. > > It's normal for Latex. It's one of the things I didn't like about IPF output > the last time I checked though. The IPF output has slightly more linking and different look to the Latex output - even though the IPF output is based on the Linear writer. I don't want the look of CHM though (standard HTML converted to CHM doesn't work) - I find that a bit over crowded, and lots of the links have no meaning in CHM (though it suits HTML with popup windows). The Latex output is very neat, and I wanted to keep that style with IPF (which I consider a type of eBook). Curious, when last did you look at DocView and say rtl.inf? I just uploaded new binaries of both onto SourceForge. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
