Am 02.08.2013 13:32, schrieb Michael Schnell:
On 08/02/2013 01:15 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
Application.ExeName is a rather abstract functionality (in the end it just works with ParamStr(0) anyway...).
Grrr. I meant it might be property that calls an abstract function to force siblings to implement it. (TCustom... classes are often done like that)

Then you need to express yourself more precisely :P

Regards,
Sven

--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to