One more thing: FPC could give much better and consistent info about the options than what the current "fpc -i" and "fpc -h" do. For example the help refers to "fpc -i" for possible values for selection lists but does not mention which list to look for. I had to make a hard-coded mapping which again undermines the idea of a generic parser. Also, -Oo, -OW and -Ow options must be hard-coded to show individual options.
Can somebody please verify that my guesses were right. I hope in future fpc help will be more exact and consistent. It would benefit not only my parser but also human readers. Juha -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
