On 2013-11-29 11:01, Michael Schnell wrote:
On 11/28/2013 10:29 PM, Santi wrote:
I don't want to use Lazarus because it is the last defender of
"Native controls" against the evil "web-controls". I want to use
Lazarus because I want to use a powerful language like Pascal in the
backend and a framework with a RAD that allows me write GUI
interfaces quickly.
Yep.
Because it wants to provide RAD, the LCL GUI designer is one of the
most easy to use GUI designers. I once failed on trying to find an
"active" web page designer tool that comes anywhere close regarding
user friendliness.
RAD is only small addition. I use Delphi from several years and don't
use RAD (design forms by mouse). And many professional developers drop
RAD and made forms in code.
Thus for me a "Web GUI" LCL Widget type makes a huge lot of sense
(even if the count and features of the widgets usable in this mode is
restricted vs the "local" widgets.
Some times (and increasingly) they are much powerful: 3d look,
textures, animated, structural hints etc.
In fact it should be possible to switch between "Web GUI" and "local
GUI" just by setting the Widget type variable.
This is background
Decent messages for stuff that does not work on the WebGUI appreciated.
I think that 99.9% code may work on proper WebGUI
This is then same like switch form Intel to ARM or to x64. When
library/compiler developers take care, rest can no/small worry about it.
Darek
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
