On Fri, 27 Dec 2013 15:35:12 +0200, Mark Morgan Lloyd
<[email protected]> wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2013-12-27 09:45, Chris Crori wrote:
i use DCPcrypt in my project and found out that the rijndael
cipher gives different results in Lazarus 1.2 than the results i got
in Lazarus 1.0
Also as Mark mentioned... Some test code with expected results would be
very valuable in debugging this issue.
I notice a health warning at http://wiki.freepascal.org/DCPcrypt
relating to non-standard key sizes. Graeme, I see you're down as the
maintainer: does Rijndael have a self-test and (Chris) are you using it?
I see that I've extended the Tiger2 self-test to make sure UpdateStr()
concatenates properly, but I've not recorded why I thought that was
advisable. That procedure does look sensitive to whether its parameter
is ASCII or Unicode, and something like a £ character in the input could
mess things up.
I think you 're onto something, my key is in UTF-8 so maybe that's the
problem.
i didn't even look for self test
:( (kind of feeling stupid right now, unable to help)
also, Graeme :
Some questions:
1) Did you use the same FPC versions? FPC Trunk has had some major
changes compared to previous released versions.
I used only FPC 2.6.2
2) What target platform did you test with? 64-bit, 32-bit etc?
3) Was OS did you test on? Was both tests on Windows, was it the
same version of Windows? Or was it Linux vs Windows etc.
I have same results in win7, 32 and 64 bit, and winXP 32 bit
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
