On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, silvioprog wrote:
2014-02-05 Michael Schnell <[email protected]>:
On 02/05/2014 08:58 AM, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
I have succesfully developed such (big) projects in Lazarus:
Server side is Lazarus (more specific: fcl-web and the
webdata/json-rpc modules)
Client side is ExtJS - but JQuery, qooxdoo or dojo (or whatever the
hype is these days)
would work equally well.
Great !!!
IMHO, it would be a huge advantage, if the LCL would support this by an "xxx"-
WidgetType / xxx = one of
ExtJS, JQuery, qooxdoo or dojo (or whatever the hype is these days). :-)
(I remember ExtPascal on that behalf, but AFAIK, it never really worked
decently and is sleeping right now.)
-Michael
There is any advantage to convert JS to Pascal and vice versa, because you
would be doing the work that the browser
already does. These conversions always end up decreasing performance, and let the
programmer "prisioneiro" to a
particular widget. And affect the maintainability, because instead I open and
edit a simple JS, I need to edit the
JS mixed in Pascal, recompile an executable and so on.
And that is why, starting soon, we'll let the FPC compiler output JS.
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
