>  No idea who is the current maintainer of fpspreadsheet
I'm doing most of the development currently, no idea if I am the maintainer then...

Thanks for pointing me to this bug which I've seen for some time, but did not take seriously enough. But your solution is not working here, in fact I don't understand why it is working at all since the fpsfunc needs the TsBuiltInExpressionManager which is declared in fpsexprparser.

Now I removed the dependence on fpsfunc from fpexprparser, and after moving the "RegisterStdBuiltins" from fpexprparser to fpsfunc and the "ExprFormatSettings" from fpsfunc to fpsexprparser, the packages and demo projects compile. But now the built-ins - a central element of the parser - are no longer registered in the parser unit itself which does not seem right to me ( --> r3678).

I am aware of the fork of the exprparser, and initially I had been trying to extend it to fit into the fpspreadsheet infrastructure. But soon I realized some limitations of the exprparser: The parser uses hard-coded programming-style expressions which are not used in the spreadsheet environment. The hard-coded "and", for example" interferes with the "AND()" function of the standard spreadsheets. My main difficulty was how to put cell references into the existing code. This naturally leads to a dependence on fpspreadsheet. And even with the present version I am fighting with the rather strict data type checks of the parser. Finally I decided to fork the parser to get me a step forward. But if you have a better idea I'd be happy to use it.



--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus

Reply via email to