zeljko wrote:
On 01/11/2015 04:23 AM, Anthony Walter wrote:
Oh, and here is an extra bit of information I neglected to mention. When
I use FPC 3.0.1 to compile against the trunk version of Lazarus, there
are no errors.
The point is, I think we should have a fixes version of Lazarus which
can build with the new fixes 3.0 version of FPC.
Don't expect that lazarus 1.2 will be changed to be compileable with fpc
3.0 (in that case someone may ask same thing for lazarus 1.0). Trunk
compiles with 3.0, so lazarus 1.4 will be able to compile with fpc-3.0.
I'm currently trying to test some of the less-common architectures with
the end-of-era 2.7.1 and Lazarus trunk. Obviously this is a personal
effort, but on occasion some sort of marker indicating which
version/revisions on the FPC and Lazarus svn systems /should/ work
together would be useful.
I've had a lot of hardware problems over the last year, and in several
cases finding the correct combination of compiler and LCL that would
allow me to reconstruct a particular binary was tricky. I've spent a bit
of time over the weekend working out ways that I can insert the svn
revision numbers of all relevant parts (i.e. a project itself, FPC and
Lazarus) into a binary when it's built, but that's not much help for
some of the older binaries particularly those which had to be built with
FPC 2.7.1 due to code generation issues.
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
