On 06/15/2015 05:04 PM, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 2015-06-15 15:44, zeljko wrote:
I'm using it (LCL-Qt 32bit...qt-4.7.4 carbon) for commercial (database
related) apps....haven't spotted problems.
Good to know, thanks. For now I'll stick to LCL-Carbon, seeing that
Lazarus IDE uses it too, and it is still the default for OSX. If I find
too many problems, I'll start investigating the alternatives.
I'm using QtLCL lazarus build on mac (less bugs than with LCLCarbon and
much more stuff implemented).
Out of interest, does LCL-Qt run on Linux, FreeBSD, Windows and OSX
equally well? That might be an option too, to overcome the many LCL
inconsistencies between platforms.
Don't know for FreeBSD (but probably works, just rebuild libQt4Pas on
freebsd), but as I already spotted, my commercial apps running on all of
them w/o problems (eg. ERP app, POS systems etc...), of course using
QtLCL on all targets.
zeljko
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
