On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:03:57 +0200 JuuS <j...@mykolab.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > Lazarus has had the number schemes 0.xxx to now of 1.4.xx > > Before falling asleep it passed through my mind about a lazarus 2.xx and... > > ...I thought what could it be? Lazarus is already so good and so feature > filled that I struggled to understand what could possibly be in or > justify a Lazarus 2.xx > > Any thoughts from anyone what a Laz 2 would be?
Probably many incompatibilities (more than usual). For example project groups, UTF-8/16 strings, dynamic packages deserve some changes that will break old code. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
