On 28/10/2015 23:02 μμ, [email protected] wrote:
On 10/28/2015 03:32 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
On 10/28/2015 01:00 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
the above link is the license URL... the stuff about patents is
off putting to
say the least...
Apologies for chopping the bulk of that message, but it's coming over
unformatted.
no problem... i do take steps to reformat some quotes some times...
The patents issue relating to zlib etc. is way out of date, see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LZW#Patents for a summary.
it isn't those patent issues... there's something else that the
license link
page talks about...
Go on...
crypto patents or something, i guess... it says that if there are any
patents in the software that the code cannot be used... click the link
and read it and you'll see it, too...
That's not what it says at all.
what its says is that even if you do use an other library, the scrypt
algorithm is the same so you do need check for patents on it and comply
with your countries patent laws. In any case the library's license is
less restrictive than mpl.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
