On 18/11/15 15:32, Lukasz Sokol wrote:
On 18/11/15 13:55, Norbert Crettol wrote:
On 18/11/15 14:38, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 05:22:44 -0800
Aradeonas <[email protected]> wrote:
Maximum 100 I think.At least it is better that 75. More is better ;)
If you want a lossless image, you use for example png, not jpg.
(100 in jpg is still not lossless).
You choose the jpg format to get a small file.
100 is definitely not the best default.
Mattias
Hello,
To display my photographs on a monitor,
I usually use a 80% jpeg compression.
That's not good for printing but fair
enough for a computer monitor. If you
want a better quality, don't compress.
Norbert
BTW: this is my first post on this list
Hi Norbert,
you're welcome,
please note, that the netiquette of this list asks to
preserve the order in which the messages are being answered to;
(with your answer inline or under the message you are replying to).
(unless you have a reason not to, e.g.
using a screen-reader / voice composer for visually impaired)
(I let myself to rearrange this message accordingly as an example)
There are numerous reasons why it is so, feel free to search the Net for
'Netiquette' ;)
Thanks for the reminder. I'll do that
Norbert
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
