On 09/12/2015 15:27, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:31:20 +0000
Mark Morgan Lloyd <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
How about a stable Lazarus v2.0.x, with as many bugs and development
quirks as possible worked out of it, based on FPC 3.0.x and with a
support commitment from both teams?
...
If you want to maintain a third branch with longer life, you can
volunteer to maintain it. Note that building all release binaries and
uploading them takes some hours. If you have a build farm
you can automate a lot of things. I can help you set it up.
+1
man power is the main issue. Building and testing.
Then a set of rules how to decide what to merge to lts.
As for the version number, I dont see any relation between 2.0 and lts.
it can same as good be based on 1.4 (if you want 2.6.4 continued), or on
1.6 (once 1.8 or 2.0 is out).
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
