16.12.2015 17:34, Werner Pamler пишет: > Am 16.12.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Maxim Ganetsky: >> There is no const modifier in this excerpt. > > Oh, I see your point now. Fortunately, the "const" is really not > necessary here. Without the "const", would this idea of accessing the > translated string be ok?
Yes. > I do not want to translate the string again because this would bring the > hassle of finding the po file into TAChart. > > Another question related: Is it possible to find the address of a > resource string in the internal resource string table by using its hash > value? This would allow me to go back to the old calling convention > which had a "string" in the RegisterXXXX procedure (instead of a pointer > to a string): In this procedure I could calculate the hash value of the > passed untranslated resource string, store it and use it later to > retrieve the translated string from the tables. I don't know, TBH. -- Best regards, Maxim Ganetsky mailto:[email protected] -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
