On 2016-02-18 10:25, Ondrej Pokorny wrote: > So this is wanted and by design. It is also coming from Delphi.
>From what I remember (Delphi 7 and earlier), any TCustomXXX is used for descendants and component writers. The "final" class without the "custom" part in the name is simply a empty class, but with the properties Published. I know the Delphi form designer used TForm for descendants - I always thought that to be wrong (from a design point of view). I understand why Delphi did that though - to overcome the Delphi Form Designer limitations, where it uses RTTI get read and set properties, and thus needs published properties. TApplication is not a component you can drop on a form though, so should not be grouped with the same limitations as the Delphi Forms Designer. My argument is exactly the same as why many components use TStrings as a property parameter, instead of TStringList. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://fpgui.sourceforge.net/ My public PGP key: http://tinyurl.com/graeme-pgp -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
