Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 06.11.2005, 12:42 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:28:11 +0100
> dannym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Am Sonntag, den 06.11.2005, 12:22 +0100 schrieb Mattias Gaertner:
> > > On Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:01:52 +0100
> > > dannym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > patch attached.
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > gdkimage bpp is _bytes_ per pixel.
> > > > >
> > > > > In the lcl it is compared with a value that is _bits_ per pixel.
> > >
> > > Because here it is bits per pixel. For example: 32.
> > > It seems the bpp meaning vary. We have to find out, when it is what.
> >
> > I see...
> >
> > very weird.
> >
> > Both the gtk 1.2 docs
> > http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/gdk/gdk-images.html#GDKIMAGE , and
> > the gtk 2.6.2 docs
> > http://www.gtk.org/api/2.6/gdk/gdk-Images.html#GdkImage state:
> >
> > guint16 bpp; /* read only. bytes per pixel */
> >
> > What version do you have ? Can you check the docs in your gtk version's
> > source tarball?
>
> I know, that the docs say it *should* be bytesperpixel.
> And it often is. See other places in the gtk interface.
> Just google and you will find other people with the same weird behaviour. I
> hope these problems are fixed gtk2.
gdk image does not "exist" anymore in gtk2. It is copied over from
gtk1.2 and deprecated. So I'd guess it's the same...
(replaced by gdkpixbuf, so I fear there is no incentive to fix it ...)
though I've never used gdkimage before, so ... don't know for sure...
> I added a simple heuristic.
ok :)
>
> Mattias
>
cheers,
Danny
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
