On Monday 09 January 2006 06:31 pm, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > I am interrested in a Qt LCL, and even more on a Qtopia LCL latter for Qtopia LCL: alot of work for little benefit. A form designer for a small screen ? But LCL Gtk can be used for the X-ROMS (if you get gtk-arm compiled)
> PDAs. Your test program looks very good =) especially the update of yesterday. (added QPEApplication class, that gives me theming,rotation,etc.) >> Do you think we should work with qt4 and not qt3? If so, why? Is qt4 >> backwards compatible to qt3? The Qt3 bindings of Andreas are marvelous but huge. My Qt4 binding should be more than sufficient for an LCL interface or a CLX interface. But not enough for large full Qt apps. > > I just recompiled my LCL against qt. Now I tryed to link an application > against this qt LCL. I get an error message: > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -llzqt > magnifier.dpr(82,1) Error: Error while linking > > Any idea what is missing in my system? There is almost nothing there for LCL Qt. If there would be an LCL/Interfaces specialist that would create a larger framework, I could contribute in trimming/extending the Qt4 binding (some inheritance problems may need manual binding work, that is what I could contribute). I do not know LCL, so I cannot start this. I have read the wiki about interfaces, it only learned me that there is too much I do not know. The design should be in line with the other interfaces, an lcl/interfaces specialist should do this, before we do ugly/incorrect things. Here is the Qt4 binding and sample source code: http://users.pandora.be/Jan.Van.hijfte/qtforfpc/qt4fpc.html kind regards, Den Jean _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
