> > > I will take a look. Of course we should rename it then. For example
> > > StdImages.pas.
> > > And of course using one item in an appliation should not include 50
> > > others as well.
> > Well yes, that was my thinking too, but perhaps we could generate a
single
> > unit per image and use that in StdImage.pas some way. I'm just thinking
up
> > load.
>
> One unit per image? Is this a typo?
Actually no, but I realise what a beast this would become. The point is that
unused units are not linked in to make the footprint smaller. This is what
we should do (as you point out). So making units of an image could take
benefit of this behaviour. This is the pragmatic approach, but perhaps you
have proper generic alternative?
Darius
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
