On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 20:36:21 +0100 (CET)
Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 11 Mar 2006, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
>
> >
> > Here is the november mail:
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 20:16:21 +0100 (CET)
> > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >[...]
> > > This is correct. Revision 1698 contains this fix.
> > >
> > > The behaviour is now:
> > > - If -o contains a path, it overrides any previous -FE.
> > > If -o does not contain a path, it leaves any -FE setting intact.
> > > - If -FE is specified after -o, it will override the output path.
> > >
> > > So
> > >
> > > -FEdir1 -odir2/binfile outputs in dir2
> > > -FEdir2 -obinfile outputs in dir2
> > > -odir1/binfile -FEdir2 outputs in dir2
> >
> >
> > It seems, the description is nice, but the examples demonstrates the
> > reality. ;)
>
> ? Do you think it's not correct ?
>
> home: >ppc386 -iD
> 2005/11/28
> home: >ls
> dir2/ p.pp
> home: >ppc386 -FEdir1 -odir2/binfile p.pp
> home: >ls
> dir2/ p.pp
> home: >ls dir2
> binfile* p.o
> home: >rm dir2/binfile; ppc386 -FEdir2 -obinfile p.pp
> home: >ls dir2
> binfile* p.o
> home: >rm dir2/binfile ; ppc386 -odir1/binfile -FEdir2 p.pp
> home: >ls dir2
> binfile* p.o
> home: >ls
> dir2/ p.pp
>
> So, unless the compiler was changed afterwards, the behaviour
> is exactly as described, so it seems to me ?
>
> I admit to being sloppy from time to time, but I tested
> the behaviour extensively that time...
I'm sure you did.
But -o overrides the whole -FE, not only the output of the exe, but the unit
output too.
FPC 2.0.2 and 2.0.3 (a few days ago) do this:
ppc386 -FEdir1 -odir2/binfile p.pp
ls -l dir1 dir2
dir1:
dir2:
binfile p.o uni1.ppu unit1.o
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
