On Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:17:59 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> Flávio Etrusco wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> After having some trouble finding T(Graphic)BevelCut and seeing many
> >>> others had too, I'm wondering why don't declare aliases for the
> >>> enumeration values.
> >>> e.g. in Controls.pp, 'const bvRaised = GraphType.bvRaised;'.
> >>>
> >>> Sure, it's not an absurdly elegant solution and would be kind of a
> >>> maintenance issue, but seems worth IMHO.
> >>>
> >>> Comments?
> >
> >> The lazarus team refused that:
> >> http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=941
> >
> > The lazarus team refused to *move* declarations from GraphType to
> > other units. Making an alias was *not* what was proposed in that issue.
> >
> > Vincent.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > "unsubscribe" as the Subject
> > archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
> >
> >
> A solution is quite difficult. The most annoying thing with Lazarus is
> the stupid unit architecture with tons of include files and
> incompatibles "Lazarus" types like Lxxx....
What is the problem with include files?
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
