Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
On 04/04/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I use option (1), my executable ends in the \units directory.
Correct. If you do not specify a target filename, the IDE puts everything
into the output directory.
To separate the output, specify separate output files/dirs.
If I use option (2), my executable ends in the <project> directory,
Ok. Custom options are up to the expert programmer.
This still makes no sense. Both options are using the same compiler
option -FU<path> so why is it okay for them to have dirrenent results?
At the moment option (1) works exactly like the compiler option
-FE<path> putting all compiled units and executable in the <path>
directory. Surely there should be a difference to when you use -FU
compared to -FE?
And where does -o fit into this reasoning?
Vincent
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
