Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> > With a smart/cosmetic name change the same goes probably like this:
>
> 9 years ago, FPC changed it's name after being 1 1/2 known to the
> internet and it was a lot of work and caused a lot of confusion.
FPC is straight forward, like gcc. No need to change it.
> > Client> What language do you use to implement our system.
> > Devlpr> OpenRAD. It allows me to pick a language specific to your
> > needs.
>
> Well, that's a lie :) Lazarus supports only Object Pascal.
>
> If you're lying anyways, you can also tell the customer you're using an
> OpenRAD but it's in fact FPC and lazarus if you care about the name.
That's Lazarus, what about OpenRAD?
> > Client> Wow!
>
> Feel free to create OpenRAD based on FPC, gcc and lazarus ;)
Lazarus isn't a language, it's a RAD. And a good one too!
But it would be sad to see this effort being expended towards one language
only.
Lazarus is too good, not to be leveraged.
Think about it!
Thanks!
--
Al
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
