> About 2: > The whole Lazarus IDE works with strings, not widestring. > The LCL will use strings, because that is more compatible to > existing code. > Existing LCL applications using synedit uses strings. > > It seems to me, we should merge with the normal synedit, > instead of unisynedit. But maybe I missed a point?
Maybe they want to keep both an ANSI SynEdit and a Unicode SynEdit. In that case if Lazarus one is Unicode only it should contribute to the UniSynEdit all Unicode stuff and to both SynEdit and UniSynEdit the rest (problem may be that they did their own codefolding - not sure which one works better) ---------------- George Birbilis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Microsoft MVP J# for 2004-2006 Borland "Spirit of Delphi" * QuickTime, QTVR, ActiveX, .NET, Delphi VCL, XML, IPC http://www.kagi.com/birbilis * Robotics http://www.mech.upatras.gr/~Robotics http://www.mech.upatras.gr/~robgroup _____ avast! Antivirus <http://www.avast.com> : Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0630-1, 24/07/2006 Tested on: 25/7/2006 10:41:03 p? avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2006 ALWIL Software. _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
