Adrian Maier wrote:
On 24/08/06, Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then you should better use the snapshots. There are now already fixes in
the 2.1.1 snapshot for postgres, which won't make it in 2.0.4.
The rc's were only meant to test the installation-procedures on all
different platforms. And maybe to see if there were any show-stoppers.
It looks like I was overestimating the importance of the rc's ...
That's why it's more usefull for the developers if people use the
snapshots. Bugs like the sqldb-bug should already be found before we
start building release candidates.
Woudln't be using svn equally useful for the developers? I don't like
snapshots: they are big compared to a 'svn up' . When trying
development
versions i'd rather go all the way and use svn .
I would say more useful to the developers, because it easier for you to
create patches using svn than using snapshots.
This is the branch that will eventually become the 2.0.4 release :
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/tags/release_2_0_4 , right ?
No, these are the source were fpc 2.0.4 (the release) is / will be build
from. This directory is frozen and no updates will be made to it.
It was copied from this branch
http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpc/branches/fixes_2_0/
Vincent
Cheers,
Adrian Maier
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
