On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:39, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: > On 10/31/06, A.J. Venter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Actually though -for me personally, QT would be a more important - once > > KDE4 is out, openlab WILL switch, and nothing would make me happier than > > to migrate wole, olad and the installer to QT instead - maximum > > integration. > > I don´t want to rain on your parade, but I think there are several > factors that make this bounty more suitable to Gtk2, such as: > > * Qt is still too far from running Lazarus stably. > * Gtk 2 has a better license scheme, so It´s more suitable to write > proprietary software. > > You don´t need a Qt Lazarus IDE to build software for Qt-LCL. Also, as > Qt-LCL already supports Utf-8, a fully-working Gtk2 IDE will make > development for Qt easier. You misunderstood me - my part of the bounty goes for GTK2 as well - I would LIKE QT in due time - but even just having GTK2 working well and stably would be worth it.
A.J. PS. And I can confirm that for me as well, synedit is unusable in GTK2 - it's slow, unresponsive and flakey - and I have very fast machines. A.J. -- "80% Of a hardware engineer's job is application of the uncertainty principle. 80% of a software engineer's job is pretending this isn't so." A.J. Venter Chief Software Architect OpenLab International | +27 83 455 99 78 (South Africa) http://www.getopenlab.com | 086 654 2898 (Fax) http://www.silentcoder.co.za | +55 118 162 2079 (Brazil) GPG Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x27CFFE5A
pgpijzQEu1S1g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
