On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:40 -0200, Flávio Etrusco wrote:
> On 1/7/07, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:07:03 +0100
> > Joost van der Sluis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have some questions about the Lazarus Makefile's.
> > >
> > > First: why is lazarus installed in share?
> >
> > Historical reasons. Many programs are installed there under linux.
> >
> >
> > > /usr/share is hard-coded in
> > > Makefile.fpc, and so it's hard to change. But since there's compiled
> > > code in lazarus, I would say that /usr/lib is the right place...
> >
> > Yes, at least the linux FHS seems to suggests this.
> >
>
> IIRC the right place for installations not handled by the package
> manager is /usr/local? (/usr/local/lib in this case)
That's why I only mentioned 'share' and 'lib'. Since I'm working on a
package for Fedora Extras, it will be /usr/lib. The rpm provided by 'the
lazarus-team' should use /usr/local/lib.
Joost
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
