On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 02:25:32PM +0100, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:19:08AM +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > On 2/27/07, Marco van de Voort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not only for MPL, but also to allow commercial devels to create
> > > > designtime
> > > > packages and component editors.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This opens another can of worms as was discussed earlier in the month
> > > on the FPC Dev mailing list. Currently Lazarus doesn't support dynamic
> > > loading of packages, which makes it impossible for commercial
> > > companies to create packages without releasing the source.
> >
> > With the current package structure and compiler bugs, that is true
> > regardless
> > of the license issue, so the whole point is moot anyway :-)
>
> No, the MPL case still applies.
Oh, and for commercial components that come with source it is also still
important. Not all come as binary only.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
