Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
> On 4/3/07, Sergei Gorelkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, not. By now fpGUI has (most of) the look, but does not
>> have the
>> feel. For example:
>
> I was only making a statement against the look. I know the 'feel' as
> a lot more outstanding.
> Thanks for your observations though. I'll add them to my Windows todo
> list. As a non-windows user any such hints are welcome and
> appreciated.
>
>> of legacy bugs and external dependencies, and at the same time
>> compatible with VCL to a certain degree, it has real potential to
>
> At first I wasn't steering towards VCL compatibility, but I have
> changed my mind since. I think getting fpGUI more VCL compatible will
> help attract more users of fpGUI and minimize the learning curve. I'm
> not aiming for 100% VCL compatible either, as I think some things in
> the VCL can be improved on, and will implement those in fpGUI.
If you don't want VCL compatibility, then better help with msegui.
MSEgui/ide is already an excellent non native/non vcl compatible gui
development system.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
