On Tue, 3 Apr 2007 19:07:14 +0200
"Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/3/07, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got the impression, there is no short example for the need of
> > AllocateHWnd. The only reason seems to be making it easier to port a
> > special winapi IPC mechanism.
>
> Isn´t that enougth?
Well, it is enough to implement something like AllocateHWnd, not that we
need exactly this.
If AllocateHWnd can be implemented (enough for Orpheus and graphics32)
easily on all widgetsets, then let's do it. Otherwise we should think
about using/extending the existing FPC/LCL IPC mechanisms.
IMHO the idea of the LCLIntf is to provide those parts of the winapi,
that can be done on all widgetsets without emulation. The rest is done
with FPC/LCL specific functions.
> Very large packages as orpheus and graphics32 rely on it, and having
> it present makes porting quite easier.
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
