I like the X11-version of OO way more better then the native one. The native one works slower, a bit unstable, has less features but on the other side more problems. (But I must admit, I tested it one year ago or so.)
And it's also no problem to have X on your Mac OS X, it's installed by default and if it's not, you can very easily install it. And there are some other applications which need X, for example Gimp and most other Linux application (and while most native Mac OS X applications are shareware/commercial, you have the choice between Linux application under X or a pirated copy of some native application). Greetings, Albert Am Donnerstag, den 31.05.2007, 09:16 -0400 schrieb Hess, Philip J: > Felipe, > > Have you tried NeoOffice? It's a native OO port for OS X. I don't think > many Mac users would be happy with an X11 version of OO. > > http://www.neooffice.org/neojava/en/index.php > > Thanks. > > -Phil > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [lazarus] App bundle and icons for x11 apps on macintosh > > Hi, > > I just installed open office on macintosh. It requires X11 to run, but > it is as easy to install (just drag the folder from the dmg), to run > (can be put on the docker) and uninstall as any good aqua application. > > That's really very interresting, because if Open Office can do it, we > could do the same for Lazarus =) > > Yes, of course we still need fink and gtk, but with each improvement > things can easier =) > > I will try to look at this when I have free time ... > > bye,
