Zitat von Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> > On 25/07/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All in all I think it would be better to have a PageControl with 2 tabs
> > > "Quick build" and "Custom". It's cleaner and more conform the other
> > > dialogs in the IDE. The jumping of the buttons is weird and disturbing.
> > > (to my taste).
> >
> > I agree. Jumping buttons are normally a GUI design NO-NO.
>
> Correct, but I was thinking we could have options folding instead of pages.
1. Folding should be done with a folding control, to allow easy designing. But
because we don't have yet a folding control I vote for using a
pagecontrol/notebook.
2. The Target OS/CPU/Dir and 'Options' are definitely advanced options.
I think most people only need
'Clean up and build all',
'Build all',
'Build LCL',
'Build IDE with packages',
'Build IDE without packages',
and the Interface radiogroup option.
The components are built automatically anyway. The clean up makes only sense
after an svn up. If you want to cross compile, you probably read the wiki and
there the 'advanced' options are described.
Mattias
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
