On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> Giuliano Colla schreef:
> > I was refrained from proceeding in the user friendly buildlazdialog
> > implementation, because I had found a number of problems in the tabbed
> > notebook resizing.
> > Now I've taken a more pragmatic approach. Instead of considering all
> > conceivable resizing, I just tested again resizing *that matters*. I.e.
> > designer resizing, to fit something more, and user resizing the window. It
> > turned out that under those constraints the tabbed notebook solution is
> > fully acceptable.
> > I attach a screenshot of the "quick" page. I'll post the "advanced" page in
> > a separate e-mail, not to exceed message size.
> > The user choices both for LCL and IDE widget set, and for quick or advanced
> > screen are stored among the other configuration parameters, and therefore
> > are remembered.
> > The advanced page reflects the quick page choices, i.e. if you make your
> > choices in the quick page, and then click on advanced, you see the result of
> > your choices in the traditional way.
> > Waiting for (constructive) criticism ;-)
>
> It is looking great. I just don't see, why you need two comboboxes for the LCL
> interface.
Because it makes the dialog easier. Otherwise the pagecontrol takes only half
the form etc. That's busy. Like it is, it is light and easy.
It looks great. If I had to do it, I would have done it exactly like this.
Michael.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
