Paul Ishenin wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
Does this mean UTF-8 was chosen only because it is more compatible
with existing pascal programs? Any other reasons?
Is UTF-16 cover all languages? As I know it have problems with Chinese
and/or Japanese languages. While utf-8 doesnot have such problems.
More over most software uses English as default language. UTF-8
encoded English words are still the same as non-encoded English words.
Btw, I dont know other advantages.
Best regards,
Paul Ishenin.
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
As far as I read it , it does because one character is encoded as 2 byte
or 4 byte.
Marton Papp
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
