On 13/11/2007, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you also skip the trivial implementations ? >
Yes, that's why I only listed 3 items in my previous email. As I mentioned, that tools isn't perfect and I don't think any automated tool can be. At least it highlights the good and bad. Hence the reason a human needs to review the marked code to get rid of false positives (which see to be the majority listed). > method can only be done in one efficient way. So it make's sense that > they look equal. I'm not arguing that. I totally agree.. hence the reason I mentioned 'false positives'. Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
