On Nov 22, 2007, at 1:41 PM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara wrote:
Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:51:36 +0100
Luca Olivetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
En/na Mattias Gaertner ha escrit:
.lfm files: no
.lrs files: it depends. It is recommended to keep them.
Why? Cannot they be automatically generated from the lfm?
And I forgot:
lrs files are normally in the source directories, which can be
readonly, so the IDE can not create them.
In subversion case this is not valid since you assume its writeable.
I had some headaches after adding lrs to svn repositories.
Definitely i don't add lrs and lps files to my svn repositories.
I agree with lps due to it contains about the session. So it should be
added into a repository.
Like .res and now I have nice commits.
And I don't have any problems with lrs. What's wrong with them ?
I created a bug report about the lpi file changes:
http://www.freepascal.org/mantis/view.php?id=10238
Luiz
--
Damien Gerard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
