On Dec 12, 2007 12:13 PM, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The LCL won't be threadsafe, the overhead isn't worth the gain.
Do you think it's an overhead to use the internal locking mechanism from GTK ?
I tend to think it's a very light mechanism that you don't even feel
in singlethreaded applications, having a threadsafe LCL means one can
freely code without any headaches from synchronization making the code
look nicer and dramatically cutting developing time, but i do think
it's a lot of code. I tend to think the LCLs overhead comes from using
classes too much in the lower level API abstraction part.
Razvan
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
