On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:39:54 +0100
Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lord Satan schrieb:
> > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:33:53 +0200 "Graeme Geldenhuys"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I still think having a custom Object Pascal written toolkit for
> >> Lazarus is the way to go. The LCL would have progressed and
> >> stabilized much faster if the Lazarus developers did that from the
> >> start.
> >
> > That's correct. And if they had used OpenGL for it, it would be
> > hardware accelerated, cross plattform and good looking, too. And we
> > would need no stupid Aero or Compiz or other composition managers.
> > And we could do things other widgetsets could only dream of. And
> > porting to OpenES would be easy, too. Stupid Lazarus developers.
>
> That's simply not the aim of the lazarus developers. They are interested
> in native gui support and high vcl compatibility, no more, no less.
That's the point. fpGUI may be a nice idea but I got a little tired about
reading how great it is over and over again (because it is really, really ugly,
not the native gui for the different supported plattforms and native gui
support has always been the aim of lazarus development - no offence Graeme).
So if any lazarus developer is offended, I apologize and instead of calling
them stupid thank them for their great work.
P.S.: Perhaps I should have used the ASM keyword to suppress any mails (bonus
points for everyone who understands this statement)
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject
archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
