On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:43 , Graeme Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > I don't accept that. The spec. was ambiguous, but certain very widely > [Snip]
Nor me. Is for that reason I'm keeping backwards compatibilty by undoing chromatic adaptation for such profiles. This introduces an extra level of complexity (i.e., display profiles are handled separately) but I think that is what an average user would expect. >Having thought it through, I would actually take the opposite approach. >Leave the CMM "absolute colorimetric" behaviour backwards compatible with >V2 (so that users and applications don't see any change between V2 and V4), >and add a new "ICCV4absoluteColorimetric" intent for those who prefer >the V4 behaviour. That is how lcms works. By default, the absolute colorimetric intent behaves in the "old'n'good" way. If the user want this new (and incompatible) behaviour, then it is as easy as setting the adaptation state to 1. The problem of a new intent is because some apps expects abs. colorimetric to be numbered 3. Regards, Marti. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
