On Thursday 12 January 2006 21:38, Hal V. Engel wrote: > After looking things over I am initially leaning toward VIGRA. It looks > like it will handle images of practically any bit depth (up to float for > each channel) and in a wide range of file types (tiff, png, jpeg, gif ....) > with the correct libraries installed. It is also portable across many > platforms. And I think I read on the Hugin list that it will handle HDR > images.
I've been playing with VIGRA myself when I was looking whether something pre-existing would make a good replacement for the ImageMagick inspired Krita core back in 2003 or so and really liked it. It's not very suitable for interactive applications, or for natural paint simulation which is what I needed, but apart from that I was very impressed. -- Boudewijn Rempt http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
pgpxqlRd6aQyB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
