On dimanche 24 février 2008, Guy K. Kloss wrote: > some feedback on the module ... I've also created a class diagram > (really simple) with eric3 to outline the structure. I'm a visual person > ...
Thank you very much for the class-diagram... and the bug report. I will take all this into account. > [...] > > Feel free to send me comments/requests/bug reports. I think the > > image-sig list is the right place for that. > > As I'm not subscribed to image-sig, but received this info here on > lcms-user, I believe it's still OK. If not, just let me know. After all, > it's in a way a Pythonic OO wrapper to lcms. Well, ImageCms uses both PIL and little cms libs, so I don't know which mailing-list is better to use. Certainly both, depending of the problem, but it is may be not a good idea, as it will spread out discussions, and lead to redundant questions/answers. On another hand, pure python problems should better be discussed on image-sig ml, as they will bother people here... Sme for little cms related problems on image-sig ml... What little cms ml users think? Should I tell people to use both lists, depending on the problem? Only little cms? Only image-sig? -- Frédéric http://www.gbiloba.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
