Hi, > > Why is the cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC gone? Is it equivalent to > > cmsFLAGS_NOOPTIMIZE? > > That is what I assumed for GraphicsMagick. It uses the same > enumerated value. Hopefully my guess was correct.
Yes, that is. The reason is because in lcms1 all possible optimization was to precalculate a LUT table. In this way cmsFLAGS_NOTPRECALC did inhibit the creation of such LUT. On lcms2, there are a number of possible optimizations, that includes but are not limited to precalculation. Therefore I changed the symbol name to make evident what is happening. There are a few more changes like that. Regards Marti ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
